The 89% problem: designing ethical, scalable autism assessments to close the wait gap
9 Oct 2025 |
| Share with
- Scale of need:In June 2025, 236,225 people had an open referral for suspected autism; 89.4% were waiting ≥13 weeks.
- Why this matters:Delays worsen educational disruption, family strain, and crisis presentations, while compounding health inequalities.
- What to do now:Commission hub-and-spoke MDT pathways with single-front door triage, scalable digital components, and embedded post-diagnostic support.
- Accountability:Link contracts to median wait reduction, throughput per WTE, and equity of completion, aligned with NHS Oversight Framework metrics.
Context & system signals
- The Integrated Performance Report (Sept 2025) confirms autism referrals are rising faster than capacity, with most breaching 13 weeks.
- The NHS Oversight Framework signals a tougher regime: productivity, equity, and outcomes will dominate future oversight.
- The Healthcare Inequalities Improvement Programme highlights how neurodevelopmental delays fall hardest on deprived communities.
- Meanwhile, the Learning Disability & Autism Programme shows inpatient reductions, proof community capacity can shift demand, but also highlighting how fragile current provision is.
Strategic implications
- Autism waits are now a board-level risk metric. With 236k+ open referrals, this is no longer an operational backlog but a systemic risk.
- Community infrastructure is the rate-limiting factor. Without investment in community MDTs, inpatient reduction simply displaces demand.
- Equity risk is material. Delays disproportionately harm deprived and minority communities, widening inequalities that are now under active oversight.
- Commissioning must evolve. Outcome-linked contracts tied to wait reduction, equity, and family experience will become the expectation.
Blueprint: an ethical, scalable ASD pathway
Single front door with tiered triage
- Rapid triage tools separate straightforward vs complex cases.
- Outcome: reduced specialist bottlenecks; faster signposting.
Hub-and-spoke MDT model
- Regional hubs concentrate specialist expertise; spokes manage pre-assessments.
- Digital tools for histories and rating scales.
- Outcome: higher throughput per WTE; consistent quality.
Post-diagnostic support by default
- Standard offer: family education, school liaison, brief interventions.
- Outcome: reduced re-referrals and crisis escalation.
Equity guardrails
- Flexible hours, translated comms, VCSE partnerships.
- Track completion by deprivation and ethnicity.
Governance and board assurance
- KPIs: median wait, completions/WTE, DNA rates, equity outcomes.
- Aligned with NHSOF dashboards for transparency.
Inequalities lens
Autism backlog delays compound inequity: children in deprived communities face longer waits and less support. Designing-in equity, through community outreach, culturally competent teams, and equity KPIs, is essential.
How ProMedical would align
- Deploy MDT pods across hubs/spokes with flexible cover.
- Provide operational playbooks and live dashboards for commissioners.
- Embed inequalities commitments in delivery models.
- Maintain IG maturity aligned with the Board’s OpenSAFELY direction.
Final word — Altin Biba, MBA, AMBA
“Backlogs this large aren’t just a scheduling problem, they’re a pathway problem. If we build assessment models that are scalable, ethical, and accountable for equity, families feel the difference quickly. That’s the benchmark ProMedical holds itself to.”
References
- NHS England. Integrated Performance Report, September 2025 (Item 4.1)
- NHS England. NHS Oversight Framework metrics list, September 2025 (Item 4.1.1)
- NHS England. Healthcare Inequalities Improvement Programme & Race and Health Observatory report, September 2025 (Item 6)
- NHS England. Update on Learning Disability & Autism Programme, September 2025 (Item 7)
- NHS England. Summary of OpenSAFELY Data Analytics Pilot Directions, September 2025 (Item 11)
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
09 Oct 2025 | Leave a comment
Share with socials